Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Initialising ...
Yoshino, Ryuji; Tokuda, Shinji; Kawano, Yasunori
Nuclear Fusion, 39(2), p.151 - 161, 1999/02
Times Cited Count：137 Percentile：95.53(Physics, Fluids & Plasmas)no abstracts in English
Aoyagi, Tetsuo; Nagashima, Keisuke; *; Mori, Katsuharu*; *; ; Kikuchi, Mitsuru;
JAERI-Research 97-010, 58 Pages, 1997/02
JAERI-Research-97-010.pdf:1.7MB
no abstracts in English
Senda, Ikuo*; Nishio, Satoshi; Tsunematsu, Toshihide; *; Fujieda, Hirobumi*
JAERI-Tech 94-018, 56 Pages, 1994/09
no abstracts in English
Kurihara, Kenichi
Fusion Engineering and Design, 19, p.235 - 257, 1992/00
Times Cited Count：5 Percentile：48.18(Nuclear Science & Technology)no abstracts in English
*; *; *; Matsuzaki, Yoshimi; ; ; *; *
Fusion Technology,1988, Vol.1, p.674 - 678, 1989/00
no abstracts in English
*; *; *; *; Fujisawa, Noboru
JAERI-M 87-112, 38 Pages, 1987/08
no abstracts in English
; Tone, Tatsuzo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al.
JAERI-M 85-178, 872 Pages, 1985/12
no abstracts in English
; *; *; ; *; *; ; *; *
JAERI-M 82-177, 78 Pages, 1982/11
no abstracts in English
*; ; *; ; ; Sengoku, Seio; ; ; ; ; et al.
JAERI-M 82-171, 45 Pages, 1982/11
no abstracts in English
; ; ; N.H.Brooks*; R.P.Seraydarian*; *; ; Yoshida, H.; *; *; et al.
JAERI-M 9698, 29 Pages, 1981/09
no abstracts in English
JAERI-M 8462, 63 Pages, 1979/09
no abstracts in English
JAERI-M 8461, 25 Pages, 1979/09
no abstracts in English
; ; ; *;
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 16(12), p.2237 - 2244, 1977/12
Times Cited Count：14no abstracts in English
; Kawakami, Waichiro; *
Ind.Eng.Chem.,Prod.Des.Dev., 15(4), p.549 - 552, 1976/04
no abstracts in English
Takase, Haruhiko; Tobita, Kenji; Sakamoto, Yoshiteru; Uto, Hiroyasu; Mori, Kazuo; Kudo, Tatsuya
no journal, ,
Analysis of plasma position control is one of important issues for design of DEMO reactor on Broader Approach (BA). Especially, plasma performance, blanket design and maintenance scheme influence the plasma position control mutually. Therefore, we made a numerical simulation code that consists of plasma equilibrium analysis, eddy current analysis and plasma motion analysis. Since we analyzed several cases of design using this numerical simulation code, the results will be shown.
Takase, Haruhiko; Uto, Hiroyasu; Sakamoto, Yoshiteru; Mori, Kazuo; Kudo, Tatsuya; Tobita, Kenji
no journal, ,
Pre-conceptual design of DEMO reactor has been preceded under collaboration Japan and Europe (Broader Approach activities (BA)). In the case of DEMO reactor, it is important for design of plasma position control to take into account the actual shape of vacuum vessel and in-vessel components precisely since the design condition of DEMO reactor is different from current tokamak devices and ITER (for example, installation of maintenance ports). To consider the DEMO design condition, the numerical simulation that consists of three modules has been developed. As results, (1) The time constants of eddy current in the breeding blankets are less than 10ms and there is no influence to passive stabilization effect. (2) The stabilization effect of conducting components decreases by considering installation of vertical maintenance port. The adoption of vertical port is related to the choice of the maintenance scenario.
Takase, Haruhiko; Uto, Hiroyasu; Sakamoto, Yoshiteru; Mori, Kazuo; Kudo, Tatsuya; Hiwatari, Ryoji; Tobita, Kenji
no journal, ,
Plasma position control for DEMO reactor has been studied using numerical simulation, which consists of plasma equilibrium, eddy current and active feedback control analyses. The stabilization effect of in-vessel components, the influence on the magnetic detector and the power of active feedback control coils are evaluated. Especially, the influence on plasma position control by installation of the breeding blanket modules is shown in this paper.
